Thursday, November 12, 2020

Demographic Score Description


Demographic Score: Color-Coded Heat Map

November 2020
Webster Hughes, PhD, Managing Principal, Multifamily Comps

This paper presents the authors’ present opinions reflecting current market conditions, which are subject to change without notice. It has been written for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or as a recommendation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product.

Purpose of This Article

Multifamily Comps LLC (“MFC”) has implemented a location-based Demographic Score within its Multifamily Predictive Analytics System (“MPAS”). The Demographic Score is used to model the impact of location-based demographic factors on property-level valuation and operating performance forecasts. This article explains the Demographic Score calculation, provides an example from the MFC property database, and introduces a color-coded heat map showing property locations with more or less demographic risks. The article concludes with an explanation for how MFC Demographic Score methodology and software can be customized to Client’s specifications and use cases.

 

                            I.               Current Investment Environment

The longest business cycle in the U.S. history ended abruptly in March 2020 as the public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 virus spread around the world.  The nation’s economy is now amid one of the most severe recessions in almost a century and there is high uncertainty with regards to how deep and prolonged this downturn will be.  Now eight months into the crisis with eviction moratoriums, loan forbearance, and stop-and-start reopening, real estate investors are grappling with how variations in renter demographic profiles will likely impact property-level operating performance. 

 

            II.             Baseline Economic and Demographic Scenario Assumptions

MPAS utilizes Baseline Economic and Demographic Scenario Assumptions as a starting point to forecast property-level revenue, expenses, CAPEX, and valuation over forward time periods.  Our Baseline Forward Scenario for Revenue assumes a deep multi-year recession with an uncertain economic re-opening and substantial variation across demographic profiles due to uneven expected job loss, renter financial condition, and exposure to the COVID-19 virus. To model the uneven economic stress across demographic profiles, we implemented a location-based Demographic Score using Census Data sourced from a 1-mile radius of each Property in the MFC Database. Our Demographic Score ranges from -10 (lowest economic stress) to +10 (highest economic stress) based on a risk-weighted average of Census items which we estimate will impact renter ability-to-pay and property-level revenue over forward time periods.

 

Table 1 provides our Baseline Revenue Assumptions for Demographic Scores ranging from -10 to +10. As the reader can see in the Table 1, we assume wide variation in Revenue Growth based our Demographic Score. While acknowledging that we have no historical experience with the impact of a pandemic on property-level, we bring decades of experience in economic analysis as relates to multifamily, applications of Census data, and all manner of investment stress analyses. It is our professional opinion is that this wide variation is warranted and should be included in any credible effort to forecast operating performance in the current economic environment.

 

TABLE 1: Baseline Forward Scenario Assumptions (Revenue) 


Industry researchers often use metro, submarket, zip code level Census averages when analyzing the effect of demographic factors on property operating performance. Whereas aggregating over these larger areas may be useful when speaking in generalities, it is not reliable for property-level analytics. MPAS uses Census data sourced in a 1-mile radius from each of the 26,000+ properties in our database. The importance of using tightly localized Census data is noteworthy. In Table 2 below, we provide an example of two properties located 3 miles apart in the same Charlotte, NC zip code with opposite Demographic Score.

TABLE 2: Opposite Demographic Scores in the same Charlotte, NC 28205 zip code


The difference in demographic profile is obvious for anyone who visits the properties. 2000 Patio Court (Demographic Score= -3) is in a leafy neighborhood next to Charlotte Country Club with high concentration of people with college degrees and working in the financial industry; 4933 Central Avenue (Demographic Score= +7) is a densely populated lower income area with high concentration of employment in construction and service industries. Table 1 shows a 12% difference in cumulative Revenue Growth for the two locations. The difference in revenue growth based on demographic profiles feeds directly into MPAS and is a primary determinant of Valuation and Operating Performance Forecasts.

Table 3 below shows underlying calculations for 4933 Central Avenue (Demographic Score= +7). It lists the Risk Factors and Risk Mitigants in order of component risk score.

 TABLE 3: Demographic Score=+7 (High Risk), Top Risk Factors and Mitigants


                                     III.            Color-Coded Heat Map

The www.multifamilycomps.com dashboard includes color-coded heat map based on Demographic Score (red=high-risk, green=low-risk). The map can be filtered by Metro, Subtype, Units, and Demographic Score. Table 4 below provides an example screenshot.

Table 4: Color-Coded Heat Map for greater TX-Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington CMSA



IV.           Customization and Alternative Use Cases

The MFC Demographic Score methodology and software can be readily customized in two different ways:

1)    Input a Client’s customized specification of the strength coefficients of the various Census data risk factors and risk mitigants used to calculate the Demographic Score.

  

2)    Apply either MFC or a Client’s customized specification to a set of locations provided by the Client. An example

 

Item #1 above translates into different Demographic Scores and therefore different MPAS Valuation and Operating Forecasts. MPAS software applications include templates for input and testing of a Client’s specifications of different strength coefficients.

Item #2 above enables a Client to specify a Demographic Score for any number of purposes and for any set of locations. An example would an investor or lender using a customized score to determine geographic acquisition and origination focus.

MFC has technology in place to collect over 300 Census data items sourced from 1, 3, and 5-mile radiuses of any set of locations (specified by either address or geographic coordinates). The Census Data is available historically as well. MFC used the historical data for statistical modeling and forecasts. We welcome customization and software projects using this technology. 

Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Automated Valuation

 

Multifamily Predictive Analytics System

Automated Valuation, Forecasts, and Comp Set Comparison

September 2, 2020

MULTIFAMILY COMPS (“MFC”) utilizes the MULTIFAMILY PERDICTIVE ANALYTICS SYSTEM (“MPAS”) to perform Property Valuation, Operating Performance Forecasts, and Comp Set Comparison Analyses for the CLIENT PROPERTIES.

The MPAS PROPERTY REPORT includes:

Ø  Automated Valuation and Operating Performance Forecasts

Ø  Demographic Risk Profile using US Census Data sourced from 1-mile radius

Ø  Line-Item Comparison to COMPSETS selected by MFC Algorithms

Ø  Line-Item Comparison to COMPSETS selected by MFC Analysts

Ø  Interactive Tableau Visualization of COMPSET ANALYTICS

Chart 1: AUTOMATED VALUATION AND OPERATING PERFORMANCE FORECASTS


Chart 2 provides a STRESS ANALYSIS of the EXAMPLE CLIENT PROPERTY versus three scenarios: 1) National Baseline; 2) National Baseline stressed up 10%; 3) National Baseline stressed down 10%.

CHART 2: MODEL FORECASTS AND STRESS ANALYSIS


The STRESS ANALYSIS shows that the EXAMPLE CLIENT PROPERTY is FORECAST TO OUTPERFORM THE NATIONAL BASELINE by approximately 10% over the 3-yr horizon. This reflects a low-risk Demographic Profile as well as other contributing factors identified by MPAS STATISTICAL MODELS.

MPAS STATISTICAL MODELS confirm that relative outperformance or underperformance versus is driven by reducing above-market expenses and increasing below-market revenue.

MPAS COMPSET ANALYTICS provide the tools to identify these opportunities.

For more information, log into www.multifamilycomps.com , view the dashboard, download the MPAS White-Paper, or contact Web Hughes, Director of Business Development, at webhughes@multifamilycomps.com  or 980-308-5222.

 

 

Saturday, August 8, 2020

Multifamily Predictive Analytics System (MPAS) Intro

Multifamily Predictive Analytics System

August 10, 2020
Webster Hughes, PhD, Managing Principal, Multifamily Comps

Our company Multifamily Comps LLC (“MFC”) co-authored a recent White Paper introducing our new Multifamily Predictive Analytics System (“MPAS”). The MPAS White Paper and can be downloaded from www.multifamilycomps.com. This article provides a brief summary of MPAS methodology and applications.

Loan and Property Database

The MFC database is created from origination files and line-item operating statements for over 30,000 loans and 26,000 properties backing Freddie Mac K-Series Multifamily CMBS collected monthly starting in 2009. In addition to financial data pulled from the Freddie CMBS files, MPAS uses US Census data collected from a 1-mile radius of each location to create a customized demographic profile for each property. The database includes, on average, 4 years of serialized financial and demographic data for each loan and property. This data configuration allows MFC to statistically analyze property-level operating performance, line-item expenses, valuation metrics, and predictive relationships across the 30,000+ loan underwritings and over 120,000 observations of year-on-year property-level performance.

Competitive Property Set Selection

The most basic MPAS application is Competitive Set Selection and Line-Item Financial and Demographic Comparisons to a Client Acquisition Candidate or Portfolio Property. MPAS Comp Set Selection Algorithms filter the MFC Database on Subtype, Distance to Client Property, Year Built/Renovated, Median Rent, Median Household Income, and Population Per Square Mile sourced from a 1-mile radius of each Property. Selecting Comps is time-consuming and tedious; and poor choice of Comps provides misleading results and invalidates analyses. Properties even within the same zip code can have very different demographic profiles (download MPAS White Paper for examples). MPAS Comp Set Selection Algorithms using localized Census data filters are key system components. Clients are additionally provided the ability to hand-select Comps from the database based on the full range of financial and demographic data.

Line-Item Financial and Demographic Comparisons

Once a Comp Set has been selected for a Client Property, MPAS Algorithms perform Line-Item Financial and Demographic Comparisons used for Acquisition Screening and Underwriting. MPAS Algorithms also identify financial line-items for which pro-active Asset Management provided the best opportunities to improve NOI. An application of Acquisition Screening would be to identify that Repairs, Utilities, and Cap Ex provided in a broker sales memorandum are too optimistic in comparison to the Comps. An application for Asset Management would be to identify those line-items as too high versus the Comps and therefore present an opportunity to reduce expenses. This functionality is fully automated with results available for both Excel download and in Tableau visualization. Example reports are available on www.multifamilycomps.com.

Property-Level Predictive Indicators

The most technologically advanced MPAS capabilities are based on proprietary statistical analyses across the MFC database. The mathematical objective of these statistical analyses is to identify persistent Predictive Indicators across subtypes, metros, broader geographic regions, historical time-periods, and 100+ independent variables. As an example, MPAS Predictive Indicators for forward NOI growth in Charlotte, NC Garden Apartment Market are: 1) below mean Revenue Per Unit; 2) above mean prior-year Expense Growth; 3) above mean Repair Cost; 4) below mean Year Built; 5) above mean Percent of Population with Cash Rent over 30% of Median Household income. The first three indicators guide an investor toward properties with revenue upside and opportunity to reduce expenses. The last two indicators guide investors to older properties in lower income neighborhoods. These criteria define a Value-Add Strategy focused on older apartments in lower income areas. MPAS Comp Set Algorithms discussed in the paragraph above automate the data collection and analyses required to determine the degree to which an Acquisition Candidate satisfies these criteria.

Automated Valuation and Operating Performance Forecasts

MPAS Automated Valuation and Performance Forecasts are generated by integrating the Property-Level Predictive Indicators discussed in the paragraph above with National Baseline Scenarios for Revenue, Expenses, Cap Ex and Cap Rates. Our National Baseline Scenarios assume a deep multi-year recession with substantial variation across demographic profiles due to uneven expected job loss, renter financial condition, and exposure to the COVID-19 virus. In the MPAS White-Paper we describe our Demographic Risk Score which we use to model the uneven economic impact across demographic profiles. We regard this as one of the most important elements of forecasting in the COVID-19 environment.

Distressed Debt

The MFC database includes origination loan term and monthly updated payment and balance information on all loans backing each Freddie CMBS deal. This granular Loan-Level data is integrated with the Property-Level Valuation and Operating Performance Forecasts to provide a

current and forward analysis of debt coverage, loan-to-value, free cash flow, and refinancing risks. The MFC dataset shows that as of the 6/25/2020 data release date, 1971 loans were either in forbearance or delinquent. This up from 297 as of the 2/25/2020 data release. MPAS Forecast Models project that 30% of loans backing Freddie Mac CMBS will require some level of capital infusion to service debt and/or refinance over the next 3 years. MPAS provides comprehensive capital structure analysis for all database properties and any Client property with available financial and loan information.

Conclusion

Log into www.multifamilycomps.com to download the MPAS White Paper, review our Comp Set Analytics, and contact our team for more information.